Executive Summary
Content marketing has long been a popular way for financial advisors to attract clients, given its ability to enhance Search Engine Optimization (SEO), increase traffic to the advisor's website, and ultimately lead to more inbound leads (without necessarily incurring a significant hard-dollar outlay). However, with consumers increasingly turning to Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered tools to find answers to their questions (potentially reducing the number of 'clicks' to advisors' websites themselves), some advisors might wonder whether content creation remains a viable marketing tool.
In this guest post, financial advisor marketing consultant Brent Carnduff shows how the rise of AI search isn't a signal for advisors to start over when it comes to content marketing, but rather a call to recalibrate their approach.
To gain the attention of AI search tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Bing Copilot), a first step for advisors is to establish their "Who-What-Where" (i.e., their name and firm, their niche or specialty, and their location or service area) and use it consistently across platforms as AI models and search engines rely on recognizable, repeated patterns to connect content back to the advisor or their firm.
Next, while traditional SEO often focuses on single keywords, AI models instead look for connected ideas, depth of understanding, and topical consistency. With this in mind, a "pillar-cluster" content model, in which content is organized around a central, comprehensive topic (the pillar) and is supported by a series of more focused articles (the clusters) that dive deeper into related subtopics. By having each cluster article link back to the pillar (and ideally to other cluster articles), an advisor can reinforce their authority and help both search engines and AI tools understand the full scope of their expertise.
Nonetheless, even when structured well, not all blog content performs equally in an AI-driven world (e.g., many broad questions are already answered by AI without a source citation). With this in mind, creating content with three key attributes – local relevance, a defined niche, and topical depth – can generate higher visibility and lead quality. Also, while traditional SEO rewarded the length of content, AI models prioritize content that gets to the point, answers questions clearly, and signals expertise fast. Which means that a relatively short piece could stand out if it answers a high-intent question directly or dives deep into a specific subtopic.
Given that AI models are trained on public data from a wide range of sources, having content appear across multiple platforms (and not just on the advisor's website) can increase the chances that it will surface in AI results. For instance, adapting blog posts that appear on a firm's website for LinkedIn and Substack (with a fresh headline, a short summary, and a link to the original blog post) can increase the content's (and advisor's) visibility with AI models.
Ultimately, the key point is that content marketing remains a potentially valuable marketing strategy in a world of AI search. By clearly demonstrating what types of clients they work with (and where they're located) and their ability to solve their unique financial planning pain points, advisors can demonstrate their expertise to AI models, find themselves cited more often in AI searches, and ultimately attract more ideal-fit clients!
Advisors are asking: Is content marketing still worth it?
It's a fair question. For years, firms have created blogs, videos, and guides to help clients and build visibility. And for many, it paid off – with stronger SEO, more traffic, and more inbound leads. But with AI-generated answers now reshaping the search experience, the path from content to client is no longer as direct. Fewer clicks. Fewer visits. More uncertainty about where the effort is going.
It's natural to wonder: If AI is answering client questions before they ever reach the advisor's site, what's the point of publishing at all?
But content isn't dead. In fact, the right content may matter more than ever – AI has raised the bar for what gets discovered and created new opportunities to rank for high-value keywords that were previously out of reach for most advisory firms. AI tools prioritize clarity, topical depth, and credible sources. That's making it harder for generic content to surface – because AI isn't just scanning for keywords, it's evaluating how well a piece answers a specific question. Vague or surface-level content often gets filtered out in favor of posts that are more focused, actionable, and relevant to the user's intent.
In many cases, AI is also opening the door to keyword opportunities that were previously out of reach for smaller firms. This shift favors advisors who create clear, specific content around their expertise – not just one-off posts, but clusters that build authority in niche topics. That kind of content is more likely to be cited, summarized, and shown – even when no click occurs.
AI tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Bing Copilot, and Google's AI Overviews are reshaping how users find and engage with financial guidance. They summarize, synthesize, and, crucially, filter. They reward clear, specific content. They recognize trusted names. And they rely on the same signals that traditional SEO has always valued: authority, relevance, and structure.
For financial advisors, this isn't a signal to start over. It's a call to recalibrate.
And while AI may reduce the number of clicks generated from search, it may also raise the value of those clicks. The real opportunity isn't in ranking for broad, competitive keywords – it's in showing up for specific, high-intent searches made by the advisor's ideal clients at key decision points. Think of searches like "Can I afford to retire at 55?" or "Roth conversion strategy for physicians in Texas." And that opportunity is still wide open.
What Hasn't Changed (Traditional SEO Still Matters)
Despite the noise around AI, traditional SEO is still the foundation of online visibility.
In the traditional search era, the strategy for most marketing-savvy advisors was clear: identify relevant keywords, create content to match, optimize metadata and headers, build backlinks, and maintain a technically sound website. The goal was to earn a spot on the first page of Google – ideally near the top – and convert visitors who clicked through.
That core model still matters. Google continues to dominate search with over 90% of the global market share. And while AI tools are evolving quickly, most still source their answers from the same websites that rank well in organic search results. Without a strong SEO foundation, an advisor's content is unlikely to be surfaced by either.
How Traditional SEO Supports AI Discovery
With the core of the SEO strategy still in place, we can think of AI tools as an additional layer built on top of search. They summarize and synthesize, but they still pull from the open web – especially from content that ranks well organically. If a firm's website lacks SEO fundamentals like optimized metadata, clear headings, and strong internal linking, it won't just underperform in Google. It may also be invisible to AI.
Local SEO remains one of the most valuable opportunities for financial advisors. The Map Pack (a set of three Google Maps-based results appearing at the top of search results) alone drives a substantial share of local search clicks – in fact, about 42% of local searches lead to clicks on Map Pack listings. These results are typically triggered by high-intent keywords like 'financial advisor', 'wealth management', or 'retirement planning near me' – the kind of searches made by users who are actively looking for help. Advisors can optimize their Google Business Profile by building local citations and collecting client reviews.
Google reviews are especially valuable for local SEO – they both influence how prominently a firm's website shows up in the local map pack and build trust with prospective clients. But AI tools often struggle to parse reviews directly from Google profiles. That's why it can be prudent to feature selected reviews on the website itself. Displaying testimonials (with compliance considerations) reinforces credibility, adds fresh content, and helps AI tools connect the firm's site with high-intent local and niche search queries.
Displaying selected client reviews reinforces credibility, adds fresh content, and improves local search performance. Highlighting a review that reflects the advisor's niche (e.g., "retirement planning for physicians") helps AI tools associate that expertise with their firm – especially if that phrasing appears consistently across their site.
And while more advisors are serving remote clients based on a targeted niche, in my experience, many still operate as generalists. That means location-specific visibility – especially in Google Maps – remains a critical opportunity for capturing high-intent leads in their area.
But it's not just Google. AI platforms are beginning to reflect local intent, too. When users add geographic terms such as 'in Denver' or 'near Boston', tools like ChatGPT and Perplexity often include city-specific recommendations or mention firms with strong local signals. In both traditional and AI search, location matters.
What's Changing (The Shift To AI-Driven Search)
It's not just the platforms that are changing the way search results are generated. We know search behavior itself is shifting. More users are turning to generative tools to answer questions directly, skipping over traditional search results altogether. Over 60% of searches now result in zero clicks, meaning users often get their answers directly in the search interface without visiting a website.
This is the core disruption: the traditional model – rank in Google, earn the click, convert the visitor into a prospective client – is no longer guaranteed.
Tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Bing Copilot, and Google's AI Overviews are becoming the new first impression. And they don't just pull data – they synthesize, filter, and recommend.
Even before AI entered the picture, ranking in traditional search had become more difficult for many advisors. In our work identifying SEO opportunities for independent advisors, we consistently found that the mid to high-volume search terms advisors wanted to rank for were heavily dominated by large media brands, fintech platforms, and national publishers with dedicated SEO teams. Search industry data shows that over 99% of pages receive little to no Google traffic, and that a small number of publishers capture a disproportionate share of search clicks. For an individual advisory firm, breaking into those rankings for search terms like 'tax loss harvesting' or 'how to choose a financial advisor' was a steep climb.
AI changes that dynamic – opening opportunities to rank for searches that were previously out of reach. Generative engines prioritize clarity, topical depth, and source diversity. They're not just looking for big names; they're looking for clear, practical, and specific content that aligns with the user's question. That opens new doors for advisors who know their niche and communicate it well.
This is where advisors can win. AI favors clarity and authority – both of which come more easily when the content speaks directly to a defined audience. Advisors who focus on narrow verticals or geographic niches can build topical authority faster and with less competition.
And while zero-click searches may reduce traffic, they can still raise awareness. Clear, focused content is more likely to be cited in AI summaries – and that visibility can make a difference, even if a user never visits an advisor's site.
AI SEO: The New SEO Paradigm
The good news is advisors don't need to completely reinvent their marketing and SEO strategy to stay visible in the AI era; rather, they can simply shift their content strategy to increase visibility in the new AI search paradigm.
Start With A Clear Who-What-Where
Before changing how content is structured, an advisor can define what they want to be known for– and aim to make that message visible across the web.
We recommend advisors focus on consistently reinforcing their Who (their name and firm), What (their niche or specialty), and Where (their location or service area).
This simple formula should show up on their website, directory listings, podcast bios, guest articles, and even their LinkedIn headline.
It's a small detail with a big impact. AI models and search engines rely on recognizable, repeated patterns to connect content back to the advisor or their firm. When the Who-What-Where is clear and consistent, it improves the chances of being cited accurately, even in zero-click search environments.
Here's an example of a clear who-what-where description:
"Jane Lee is a fee-only financial advisor at OakView Wealth. She specializes in retirement income planning for tech professionals in the Seattle area."
Shift From Keywords To Clusters
Traditional SEO often focused on single keywords: pick a search term, write a blog post around it, and try to rank. But AI models don't think in keywords – they look for connected ideas, depth of understanding, and topical consistency.
That's where the pillar-cluster content model comes into play. This strategy organizes content around a central, comprehensive topic (the pillar), supported by a series of more focused articles (the clusters) that dive deeper into related subtopics. Each cluster article links back to the pillar – and ideally to other cluster articles – reinforcing authority and helping both search engines and AI tools understand the full scope of the advisor's expertise.
In many cases, pillar content can also support – and drive traffic to – the firm's core service pages. For example, a pillar on 'Roth Conversion Strategy' can feed into the retirement planning page, helping attract more qualified leads seeking specific guidance.
It's not just a structure for better rankings – it's a framework for demonstrating real subject-matter depth and guiding users toward action.
Instead of treating each post as a standalone topic, using the pillar-cluster approach builds content around a central page (or pages) – with related articles that explore key subtopics in more depth and link back to the central theme.
As search evolves, so too does the definition of valuable content. The key is not just writing more, but writing content that aligns with the kind of questions AI is likely to surface – and that the advisor's ideal clients are likely to ask.
A content cluster is a strategic group of related blog posts – typically 6–10 (or more) articles – organized around a central topic. The structure helps search engines and AI models recognize depth, relevance, and topical authority.
It includes two core components:
- Pillar page: A comprehensive article (or articles) that covers the main topic broadly (often 2,000+ words). The pillar article doesn't need to cover every detail – instead, it introduces the key themes, often using subheadings that correspond to deeper cluster content. Think of it as the overview or guidebook that helps both readers and search engines understand the full scope of the topic.
- Cluster articles: Shorter blog posts (typically 800–1,500 words) that go deeper into specific subtopics or questions
Consider the following example, which applies the pillar-cluster content model to a series of resources on Roth Conversions:
Pillar: Roth Conversion Strategy
This comprehensive article introduces Roth conversions as a planning tool, explains why timing and tax impact matter, and outlines the main factors clients should consider. It's structured to give readers a broad understanding, while pointing to deeper resources on specific scenarios.
Pillar Article Outline: Roth Conversion Strategy
Sub-headers (Sections of the Pillar article):
- What Is a Roth Conversion?
[Basic definition and how it fits into retirement planning.]- Why Timing Matters
[Overview of tax brackets, income timing, and market conditions.]- Coordination With Other Benefits
[Introduces Medicare premiums and Social Security impacts (linked to cluster articles).]- Special Considerations for High Earners
[Discusses income thresholds and phaseouts (linked to cluster article).]- Planning Around Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)
[High-level discussion of QCDs and conversion timing (linked to cluster article).]- Common Mistakes to Avoid
[Briefly lists risks or pitfalls, with links to further reading.]- Next Steps
[Encourages contacting the firm or reviewing related resources.]Cluster Articles:
- Roth IRAs and the 5-Year Rule
- Tax Planning with Social Security
- Roth Conversions and Medicare Premiums
- Timing Conversions with QCDs
- What High Earners Should Know About Phaseouts
Each cluster article should link back to the pillar page, and vice versa. This internal linking reinforces the advisor's expertise and improves both SEO and AI discoverability.
Search engines and AI models both favor up-to-date content – especially on topics like tax rules, retirement thresholds, and regulatory changes. It's best to review the key pillar and cluster articles at least once a year to keep them accurate. Even minor updates can improve chances of a resource being recrawled or resurfaced. When appropriate, update and republish posts to signal freshness and reinforce topical authority.
For some help getting started with the pillar-cluster model, SignalStack, our free fan-out tool, helps financial advisors quickly brainstorm and organize content clusters. Fan-out simply means taking one core topic, like Roth conversions, and generating a set of related articles that explore it in depth to mimic how AI platforms gather data for and respond to a query.
New Pathways To Visibility
Generative search tools aren't just summarizing content. They're interpreting it, connecting it, and making suggestions based on perceived expertise, topical depth, clarity, and relevance – not just keywords.
To understand how to stand out in AI results, it helps to know what these tools look for:
Generative-search tools evaluate content along several dimensions:
- Topical depth – Explores a topic from multiple angles, includes relevant subtopics, and demonstrates a consistent thread of expertise.
- Clarity & structure – Uses clean formatting, straightforward language, and makes key takeaways easy to identify.
- Authority & credibility – Does the content show who the author is, what their credentials are, link to other reputable sources, and signal real-world experience?
- Relevance & specificity – Does the content directly address the user's likely question in a specific context (e.g., "Roth conversions for tech professionals in Seattle") rather than staying general?
That shift favors firms that publish content around a focused niche, such as:
- Retirement planning for tech employees
- Tax strategies for early retirees
- Financial planning for dual-physician households
Unlike traditional SEO, which could be gamed with keyword density and surface-level optimization, AI models evaluate content more holistically. They look for topical depth – content that not only introduces a subject but explores it from multiple angles across related posts. This is where content fan-outs become valuable: by starting with one core topic (like Roth conversions) and 'fanning out' into a series of related articles, each diving into a different subtopic or scenario, the advisor can demonstrate depth and topical consistency that AI tools recognize as authority signals.
They also reward clarity – straightforward, jargon-free writing that answers questions directly – and consistency, including tying content to a recognizable author. Having a named expert consistently associated with content (through bios, bylines, and citations) helps AI tools attribute authority to both the individual and the firm.
To show how this plays out in practice, consider two paragraphs covering the same topic – one designed for traditional SEO, the other for AI discovery.
Traditional SEO‑optimized paragraph (less likely to win in AI search):
"Roth conversions are a tax‑efficient way to move assets from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. Many high‑income earners consider conversions to reduce future tax liability and leverage growth. Advisors should evaluate their client's tax bracket, time horizon, and portfolio size to decide whether a conversion is appropriate."
This paragraph uses relevant keywords ("Roth conversions", "tax liability", "tax bracket"), but it lacks specificity, author voice, deeper context, and a clear audience. It reads like an SEO‑friendly overview, rather than a content piece that AI would cite.
AI‑optimized paragraph (far more likely to be surfaced by AI):
"For Seattle‑area software engineers earning over $300,000 annually, delaying a Roth conversion until after a sabbatical year can offer a strategic window when taxable income temporarily dips. By converting during that low‑income year, and then resuming deferred salary the following year, you can cap your total tax‑bracket hit and reduce your future Medicare Part B premium surge."
Here you see: a specific audience (Seattle software engineers), a timing context (sabbatical year), a tax–Medicare linkage, and an actionable takeaway. That's the kind of content AI tools can more easily identify, parse, and reference. Ideally, this would be part of a cluster of content around sabbatical timing, employer stock vesting events, and retirement income layering.
AI models increasingly favor the second example. It's clear, specific, and offers a direct takeaway that demonstrates real expertise. Put simply, content that's specific, structured, and credibly authored is more likely to be surfaced in generative responses than content that's simply optimized for keywords. And what's more, the resulting articles are likely to be more insightful to readers than a piece that was tailored to traditional SEO optimization!
Niche strategies like "retirement planning for tech employees" or "tax strategies for early retirees" don't just help in traditional search – they signal authority in AI summaries, answers, and citations. And unlike Google's traditional ranking system, which heavily favors domain authority and backlinks, AI models place greater emphasis on content depth, clarity, and topical relevance – especially when the content directly addresses the user's question. Trusted sources still matter, but smaller sites with well-structured, expert-driven content can now compete in ways that weren't possible before.
That shift creates a new kind of opportunity – one that favors focus over volume, and specificity over scale.
Finding The AI Content Sweet Spot
Even when structured well, not all blog content performs equally in an AI-driven world. Some broad questions like "What is a 401(k)?" are already answered by AI, often with no source cited. Other topics may be too obscure or low intent to generate meaningful leads.
The opportunity lies in the overlap between three key attributes:
- Local relevance (e.g., Salt Lake City retirement planning)
- Defined niche (e.g., working with physicians or university employees)
- Topical depth (e.g., Roth conversions, RMD timing, or Social Security strategies)
In our work supporting advisor SEO, this is where we consistently see the highest visibility and lead quality. In general, informational queries are increasingly answered directly by AI – often without a click – it's the high-intent, specificity-driven searches that still drive meaningful traffic. Local search has always reflected that intent (think 'financial advisor near me'), and we're now seeing similar behavior for niche-based queries and service-specific topics.
This intersection – local, niche, and deep – is what we consider the AI content sweet spot. It's where content is specific enough to demonstrate expertise, relevant enough to get surfaced, and useful enough to convert to clicks.
Example: Instead of trying to rank for "retirement planning", aim for "retirement planning for doctors in Salt Lake City".
Longform To Laser-Focused: Knowing When Each Is Appropriate
Traditional SEO rewarded length. Advisors were often encouraged to write 2,000+ word articles covering every angle of a topic – starting broad and eventually working down to specifics. That made sense when ranking depended on matching a wide range of keywords.
AI has changed that. Today's models prioritize content that gets to the point, answers clearly, and signals expertise fast. That doesn't mean short content always wins – it means content needs to lead with what matters.
When a post answers a high-intent question directly, or dives deep into a specific subtopic, AI is more likely to surface it – even if it's not the longest piece on the web.
With that said, longform content still has a role – but not every post needs to be 2,000+ words. In the cluster model, the pillar article is where depth still matters. It provides a comprehensive view of the core topic, while the cluster articles focus on answering specific, high-intent questions clearly and concisely.
Together, this structure builds topical authority, improves AI discoverability, and meets readers where they are.
Make Your Content Discoverable Beyond Your Website
Creating content is only part of the equation. To be surfaced in AI results, an advisor's expertise needs to appear across the broader web – not just on the firm's blog.
AI models are trained on public data from a wide range of sources: high-authority websites, social platforms, forums, video sites, and professional directories. According to a recent Semrush analysis of over 150,000 citations, the most frequently cited domains by AI tools include Reddit (40.1%), Wikipedia, YouTube, Google, Yelp, and Facebook.
For financial advisors, the picture gets more specific. When tracking where advisor-related mentions appear in AI-generated answers, we consistently see sources like:
- Reddit: Especially for consumer questions about finding or vetting advisors
- YouTube: Video content tied to niche strategies or retirement planning scenarios
- SmartAsset: Due to a strong SEO presence and structured advisor listings
- Wealthtender, Fee-Only Network, and NAPFA: Commonly referenced in advisor-focused summaries and local search contexts
A blog post on the firm's site is helpful – but a post that's shared on LinkedIn, cited on Medium, mentioned on Reddit, or listed in trusted directories is far more likely to be picked up by AI tools. These external signals help associate a firm or advisor's name and content with a specific niche, thereby boosting visibility in both zero-click results and traditional search results.
That's why distribution is built into the framework we use at Advisor Rankings – CReD™: Create, Reformat, and Distribute. Strategic distribution doesn't just expand reach – it reinforces credibility and increases the likelihood an advisor's expertise is surfaced, even when users never visit the firm's site.
The CReD™ Framework: How Advisors Can Optimize For AI Search
CReD™ is a strategic approach we use at Advisor Rankings to help advisors align their content with how both clients and AI search engines discover expertise today. Whether it's a Google snippet, a ChatGPT summary, or a LinkedIn first impression, each step is designed to help the advisor's content show up in the moments that matter.
Create: Start with a strategy. Build content around well-defined topic clusters that align with the firm's niche and what ideal clients are searching for. Focus on pillar articles supported by 6 to 10 cluster articles that explore related questions in more depth. Use strong headlines, internal links, and a clear editorial voice to establish topical authority and build trust.
Reformat: Prepare content for AI visibility and multi-platform use. This means adding schema markup, FAQs, author bios, and key takeaways so that search engines and AI tools can easily parse and cite content. Reformatting also includes making content modular – breaking it into pieces that can be adapted for LinkedIn, Substack, or guest posts without hurting SEO or triggering duplicate content issues.
Distribute: Share expertise beyond the firm's website. AI models and search engines pick up signals from professional directories such as NAPFA, XYPN, and Wealthtender, as well as from platforms like LinkedIn, Reddit, Medium, and Quora. The broader and more consistent an advisor's visibility across the web, the more likely their content is to be cited – even when users never click through to the site itself.
Putting It All Together: A CReD™ Example
Let's say a firm wants to create topical authority around retirement planning for university faculty. Here's how CReD™ might look in action for a topic like Roth conversions:
- Create:
- Publish a pillar article titled "Roth Conversion Strategies for University Professors" – around 2,000 words covering timing, tax brackets, coordination with university retirement plans, and common pitfalls.
- Support it with cluster articles on topics like "How Sabbatical Years Affect Roth Timing" or "Roth vs. 403(b) Withdrawals in Early Retirement."
- Reformat:
- Add schema markup
- Add a clear author bio with a Who-What-Where statement, the author's credentials, and links to the firm's directory and social profiles.
- Pull key questions into an FAQ at the end of the article
- Write a short summary with 'Key Takeaways' – usually not more than three bullet points – placed near the top of the article
- Repurpose content across both short-form and long-form platforms
Then repurpose the content across short-form and long-form platforms.
- Turn one insight (e.g., Roth conversions during sabbaticals) into a LinkedIn post to reinforce topical relevance across the firm's digital footprint.
- Rework the full article into a shortened LinkedIn or Substack article with a fresh headline, 2–3 key takeaways, and a link back to the original post – a format that's easily indexed by AI tools and strengthens authority in that niche.
- Create a one-minute video summarizing a high-intent angle (e.g., Roth timing for early retirees) and share it on social platforms or embed it in a blog post to improve discoverability.
Short-form content broadens reach and reinforces key topics. Long-form reposts on trusted platforms help search engines and AI tools recognize and resurface expertise – even outside the firm's website.
Just a reminder: Ensure all content remains compliant with SEC/FINRA disclosure rules.
- Distribute:
- Share a blog post and video as a LinkedIn post to boost engagement and signal topical relevance across platforms.
- Reformat the article into a shortened version to publish as a LinkedIn article or on Substack – include a fresh headline, a short summary, and a link to the original blog post.
Additional Tips:
- Republish the original article on Medium using a canonical link (a format that ensures the correct 'version' of the article is crawled and recognized by the search engines) to point back to the website, or stick to the shorter summary version to avoid duplicate content issues.
- For each cluster published, submit a guest version pillar piece to a niche publication or directory like Wealthtender and link out to other articles on the advisor's website.
- Mention the content in relevant Reddit threads or Quora answers.
- The advisor's profiles on FeeOnlyNetwork, XYPN, and Wealthtender can also reference the content – these platforms are increasingly indexed by AI tools and contribute to a broader visibility footprint.
These listings serve two purposes: they help AI models discover the firm during training or updates, and they contribute to authority signaling by reinforcing consistent patterns across the web.
If an advisor has been quoted in a news article, interviewed on a podcast, or appeared on a financial TV segment, those mentions absolutely count – and they're often overlooked. These types of earned media send strong trust signals to AI models and search engines alike. Think of them as credibility boosters: third-party validation that supports an advisor's expertise. Wherever possible, they can bring those mentions back to their firm's website. That might mean embedding a podcast episode in a blog post, linking to the article in their site's 'In the News' section, or sharing a clip on their 'About' page. The goal is to create consistent, connected signals that reinforce their authority – both for AI and for real people deciding whether to reach out.
This creates a web of consistent signals across platforms – building visibility and authority where both AI and their ideal clients are looking.
Opportunities In AI SEO
AI is changing the game – but not in the way many advisors fear. In fact, it may be opening more doors than it's closing.
Where traditional SEO often meant competing with massive publishers and national platforms, AI rewards specificity and clarity. Smaller firms that speak clearly to a defined audience. And doing so consistently can now surface in contexts that were previously out of reach.
Show Up In Markets That Were Previously Out Of Reach
One of the quiet shifts in AI-driven search is that location is becoming more contextual and less rigid. In Google's local map pack, if a firm is based in a suburb outside a major city, it may have struggled to rank for searches targeting that city.
AI platforms are different. They prioritize expertise and content relevance over strict geographic proximity. That means an advisor in Walnut Creek could be surfaced in AI responses for 'retirement planning in San Francisco', if their content clearly addresses that location and topic.
This opens new doors for firms in satellite cities or suburbs. If an advisor serves clients in a nearby metro area, they can write content that reflects that explicitly. Rather than just talking about 'retirement planning', they can talk about it in the context of San Francisco, or Denver, or Austin. AI will pick up those signals.
Local Isn't Just 'Local' Anymore
Location still matters – but it's no longer confined to a company's office address.
AI platforms prioritize the locations that content speaks to. That means an advisor in Wellesley can realistically show up for 'retirement planning in Boston' – not because of proximity, but because their content clearly demonstrates relevance to that geography.
If a firm serves clients across a broader region, it can say so. They can write targeted content for the cities or areas their ideal clients are searching from, even if they're 30 or 300 miles away. Just like niche content signals expertise, location references signal relevance.
"I help physicians in the Boston area navigate retirement planning."
A Firm's targets are not locked into one zip code – but they are well served to signal to the AI tools what areas they are targeting.
Even if an advisor serves a national audience, broad statements like "we work with clients across the country" don't give AI much to work with. Instead, identify and write for specific geographies or communities where the ideal clients actually are.
For example: "We help federal employees across Virginia, Maryland, and the DC area make smarter retirement decisions."
Or: "We work with university faculty nationwide but have deep experience with UC and SUNY systems."
Without this clarity, AI may skip over content in local or niche-specific results – or attribute expertise to a competitor whose content is more direct.
Shorter Content Can Still Work
With traditional SEO, ranking often required long-form posts of 2,000-4,000 words. But AI favors clarity over length. Concise, well-structured articles – especially when part of a broader content cluster – are more likely to be summarized or cited.
The opportunity lies in the middle: content that reflects a clear niche, aligns with real-world questions, and builds topical authority. It doesn't have to be long. It just has to be useful.
New Keywords Reopened
In traditional SEO, many mid-volume keywords (search terms with a moderate number of monthly queries [typically a few hundred to a few thousand]) were functionally out of reach due to entrenched competition. Terms like 'Roth conversion strategies' or 'tax-loss harvesting' were often dominated by Investopedia, NerdWallet, Forbes, and other large financial media brands.
But in generative search, clear and helpful content from smaller sites can get surfaced – especially if it's part of a recognized content cluster and includes expert attribution.
Fewer Clicks, Better Leads
Zero-click search is indeed on the rise. But the clicks that do happen are often higher intent. AI acts as a filter, exposing users to an advisor's expertise before they ever reach their site. When someone does click through, they've already seen context – often including the advisor's name, firm, or specific offer.
In that sense, AI-assisted traffic may be smaller, but warmer. These visitors aren't just browsing. They're closer to choosing.
The Compounding Advantage Of Early Adoption
AI models train on repeated patterns. When a firm is consistently cited across blog posts, directories, podcasts, and local listings, those signals reinforce themselves over time. This creates a compounding visibility effect; the more they are surfaced, the more likely they are to be referenced again.
In this new era of search, advisors have the opportunity to be early adopters once again. Once a firm is part of the AI ecosystem – regularly cited, mentioned, and linked – it gets harder for competitors to push them out.
Reaching New Communities
AI search is increasingly pulling citations and answers from places advisors may not expect – Reddit threads, YouTube videos, LinkedIn articles. These are all places where helpful, well-structured content can boost visibility.
If an advisor is already creating video content, even casually, they may consider adding transcripts, captions, or clear descriptions. Without those signals, content may be invisible to AI.
Interpreting The New SEO Metrics Landscape
As search behavior evolves, so too does the methodology to measure success. Traditional SEO metrics – like rankings, impressions, and clicks – still matter, but they no longer tell the full story.
First Came The Great Decoupling:
From 2019 to 2024, Google search impressions steadily increased – but clicks dropped, as more users found what they needed directly in search results (through featured snippets, map packs, and zero-click answers).
Then Came A Reporting Reset:
In September 2025, Google changed how it reports on lower-ranking content in Search Console. Previously, impressions were often reported for results ranked as far down as the top 100. But with the new update, impressions for content beyond the top 10–20 may no longer appear – even if a page is still technically visible in search. This can make it look like visibility has dropped, when in reality, only the reporting has changed.
So, if a firm is seeing fewer impressions in their dashboard, they don't need to panic – it doesn't necessarily mean that content is underperforming. It means visibility is now happening in more places and is tracked in fewer.
AI visibility is harder to quantify, but not impossible. With a few new tools – and a few new questions to ask – advisors can still get quality metrics to inform their AI-SEO strategy.
Track Traditional Metrics
Start with the basics:
- Organic impressions in Google Analytics 4 and clicks in Google Search Console
- Website traffic to pillar and cluster content
- Conversion events, like contact form submissions, email signups, or calls
Track AI Visibility And Mentions
AI platforms don't yet offer native analytics, but there are still ways to check if content is being surfaced.
One practical strategy: build a list of 20–25 prompts related to the advisor's niche, services, and location. Include a mix of unbranded and branded searches, such as:
- "Best financial advisor for federal employees near Atlanta"
- "Roth conversion strategy for dual-income households"
- "What is [Firm Name]?"
- "Is [Advisor Name] a fiduciary advisor?"
Then run those prompts through tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Bing Copilot every quarter. Watch for whether the advisor's content is referenced, their name is mentioned, or their firm is included in results or footnotes.
Keep in mind that these tools may personalize responses based on search history, account, or location. For a more neutral view, try using an incognito browser, logging out of accounts, or asking someone outside the firm to run the same prompts.
This informal audit helps to track visibility in the places where AI decisions begin – even when clicks don't follow.
Tools like Ahrefs' Brand Mentions can help monitor online visibility, and alerts through platforms like Scrunch or Profound can track new citations across the web.
Ask New Clients How They Found You
The most practical, and often most accurate, data comes from simply asking. When new leads or prospects reach out, advisors can ask them what they searched for, how they found them, or whether they saw them mentioned in a tool like ChatGPT or Google.
Content Marketing Isn't Dead – It's Evolving.
Traditional SEO still matters. But AI SEO is now part of the equation. For financial advisors, this is a chance to refocus: stop chasing broad keywords and start building structured, topical content that aligns with how clients are actually searching.
Advisors don't need to change their entire business model. They don't need to start a podcast or go viral on LinkedIn. By speaking clearly, consistently, and authoritatively about who they help and how they help them, advisors can position their content marketing for this new paradigm.
So yes, content marketing is still worth it. But only if it's designed for the way people search now.
The firms that localize and niche down will likely see fewer leads, but better ones. Higher intent. Pre-qualified by context. Ready to take action.
This is how visibility works now. And it's how trust starts before the first click.




