Earlier today the Supreme Court issued its ruling in the case of Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, stating that Kentucky's tax rules which exempt the interest earned on Kentucky muncipal bonds while taxing the interest of other state's bonds is not a violation of the so-called dormant commerce clause of the Constitution. The ruling spared what may have been a tumultuous disruption to the municipal bond market, but the Supreme Court's decision still leaves the door open for several issues...
As financial planners, we've all heard the old saw "never put a tax shelter inside of a tax shelter" - in other words, don't buy tax-exempt municipal bonds inside of a tax deferred retirement account like an IRA or Roth IRA.
Well, it seems that "never" may have just arrived. Because in an environment where the outright yield on municipal bonds is better than taxable bonds, it really can be appropriate to own a muni bond inside of an IRA!
Read More...
Enjoy the current installment of "Weekend Reading For Financial Planners" – this week's edition kicks off with the Financial Planning Association's transition to its new incoming President Skip Schweiss, an experienced executive and newly minted CFP professional, who is aiming to work with the FPA's incoming new CEO Patrick Mahoney to try to turn around its declining membership in a shifting environment where "CE and Community" alone don't create the distinction it once did for associations in an increasingly competitive environment (even as the social isolation of the pandemic makes connectedness more important than ever, and ongoing industry regulatory debates arguably make financial planning advocacy more important than ever).
From there, we have several investment-related articles, including:
- A discussion of whether it's still worthwhile at all to try to invest in bonds for client portfolios as yields continue to drift to new record lows
- The appeal of multi-year guaranteed fixed annuities as a higher-yielding bond alternative in the current environment
- How Single Premium Immediate Annuities (SPIAs) can be used, not as a lifetime income guarantee vehicle, but as a fixed-income alternative (with a mortality credit kicker) that simply gets reinvested back into equities as it pays out, and
- Why the advisory community may need to change its mind on the long-term staying power of Bitcoin as its recent rise nearly doubles the prior "peak" that many advisors had said was a bubble that would never be achieved again (except... it has).
We've also included a number of articles around the topic of behavioral finance and client communication:
- How to think about a 'hierarchy' of financial wellness that clients can build upon over time to improve their wellbeing
- Why it's crucial to understand a client's "money story" to better glean why certain clients make certain not-so-rational decisions
- The rise of "Financial Therapists" as either a new player in the holistic advisor team, or even a new direction (and new CFT designation) for financial advisors to pursue, and
- What it is that actually makes money so meaningful to us (hint: it's not the money itself, but what it allows us to do)
We wrap up with three interesting articles, all around the theme of looking ahead to and planning for the coming year:
- Why creating an effective Strategic Plan for 2021 isn't about going through a vision/mission exercise, but instead simply getting clearer about the Key Performance Indicators that the business needs to improve upon in the coming year
- A checklist of new (and what's-old-is-new) marketing ideas to reinvigorate growth for 2021
- A broad look at the state of financial planning itself as a profession, and what may be in store as the coming year unfolds (from more virtual client meetings to virtual team management, and the ongoing rise of alternative non-AUM fee models for advisors)
Enjoy the 'light' reading!
Enjoy the current installment of "weekend reading for financial planners" – this week's edition kicks off with the big news that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against the Department of Labor and its fiduciary rule, and moved to vacate the DoL fiduciary rule entirely... with the caveat that a separate decision from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals this week upheld the fiduciary rule, setting the table for a potential final showdown in the Supreme Court, and creating even greater uncertainty about the fiduciary rule in the meantime. Also in the news this week was the revelation that the SEC's own fiduciary rule proposal may be coming soon – sometime in the second quarter – and its likely to focus more not just on fiduciary disclosures, but also whether advisors and brokers need to be clearer with their titles.
From there, we have several practice articles this week, including: how to conduct effective staff/team meetings (which are especially important as your team grows!); why "compensation" problems with employees are rarely about compensation alone, and effective employee retention is about the more holistic job opportunity and offering; why rearranging your office space (and who sits where) can spur creativity and innovation in the business (albeit at the risk of impairing productivity); and a look at what it will take in the future to be a true "destination" advisory firm (for both future clients, and future employees).
We also have a few articles on retirement planning, from a look at planning strategies to discuss with clients in their 50s when they're still 5-10 years away from the retirement transition (or in the home stretch to saving enough to achieve it), to recent research that finds a disturbing spike in the mortality rate (especially for men) upon reaching age 62 and becoming eligible for Social Security, and a look at the pros and cons of so-called "bucketing" (or time-segmentation) strategies for retirement portfolios.
We wrap up with three interesting articles, all around the theme of household spending and cash flow: the first looks at the phenomenon of "lifestyle creep", and why it's so important to establish systems that aim to save your future raises going forward (so they don't automatically creep into your lifestyle spending); a fascinating study that finds, due in large part to how judgmental society is of the rich, that most affluent people actually try to hide their wealth and are hypersensitive to being judged about it); and the last looks at how, because money is often a major point of contention between couples in a marriage, that one of the best ways to reduce marital conflict over spending is to give each spouse a guilt-free "allowance" that they can spend on any discretionary expense they want (without fear of being judged!).
Enjoy the "light" reading!
As 2016 comes to a close, I am so thankful to all of you, the growing number of readers who continue to regularly visit this Nerd's Eye View blog, and have been kind enough to share the content with your friends and colleagues as well (which I greatly appreciate!). Over the past year, the cumulative readership of the blog has grown yet another 35%, with more than 160,000 unique readers coming to Nerd's Eye View last month. The continued growth has meant more reinvestments into features and even staffing, to continue to build this platform for the benefit of advisors. And we'll be announcing a number of major new initiatives in early 2017 as well!
Yet notwithstanding how many of you have made reading the Nerd's Eye View a weekly habit, I realize that the sheer volume of articles can feel overwhelming at times, and that it's not always possible to keep up with it all. And blog articles, once published, are usually quite quickly left in the dust as the next new article comes along.
Accordingly, just as I did last year and in 2014, I've compiled for you this Highlights list of our top 20 articles of 2016 that you might have missed. So whether you're new to the blog and haven't searched through the Archives yet, or simply haven't had the time to keep up with everything, I hope that some of these will (still) be useful for you! And as always, I hope you'll take a moment to share articles of interest with your friends and colleagues as well!
In the meantime, I hope you're having a safe and happy holiday season. Thanks again for another successful year in 2016, and I hope you enjoy all the new services we'll be rolling out in 2017, too!
My guest on today's podcast is Andrew Leonard. Andrew is the Managing Partner of Geometric Wealth Advisors, an RIA based in Washington, D.C., that oversees approximately $750 million in assets under management for about 200 client households.
What's unique about Andrew, though, is how his firm has been able to triple its AUM in the past 4 years while offering a high-touch client experience by adopting the approach of the management consulting clients he specializes in, first assessing how many new staff members they can hire and then train properly in order to, as Andrew says, increase the density talent on the team, and only then deciding how many new clients to bring on in a given year based on how quickly they've determined they can grow their team.
In this episode, we talk in-depth about how lessons from Andrew's niche, partners at the "Big 3" management consulting firms, inform Geometric's deliberate hiring and training processes, why Andrew hired a Chief Operating Officer relatively early in the firm's growth cycle (before he even hit $5M in revenue) to handle the growing people-management challenges of the firm, and how Andrew's firm has been able to maintain a strong company culture despite operating in a fully virtual environment by still including ongoing in-person get-togethers with the whole team.
We also talk about the high-touch services Andrew's firm offers its high-income clients, including how Andrew and his team shop for the best mortgage rates for clients among a curated group of lenders (and the way the firm systematized its approach to finding refinance opportunities for its clients), why Andrew decided to offer in-house tax services (after initially outsourcing to a CPA they worked with closely) despite the expense of having CPAs on staff, and how Andrew's firm integrates unique private equity investment opportunities available to its clients into the firm's broader portfolio management philosophy.
And be certain to listen to the end, where Andrew shares how a growing staff count has helped his firm navigate the "Dangerous Middle" experienced by firms as they grow from $200 million of AUM to $2 billion in AUM (even if it means tighter profit margins in the short run), how Andrew's decision to serve a specific niche has led to a steady flow of prospective clients referrals (and when hiring, interest from former consulting firm employees looking for a career change into a financial planning firm like Andrew's), and how Andrew's growing boredom over the ongoing service of long-term existing clients inspired him to grow his practice into a full-fledged business to experience the fresh intellectual challenges of being an entrepreneur.
So, whether you're interested in learning about how to build "talent density" through a deliberate hiring and training process, how to maintain company culture when operating in a fully-remote environment, or how to navigate the "Dangerous Middle" experienced by growing mid-sized firms, then we hope you enjoy this episode of the Financial Advisor Success podcast, with Andrew Leonard.
Enjoy the current installment of "Weekend Reading For Financial Planners" - this week's edition kicks off with the news that customer arbitration claims related to the SEC's Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) nearly doubled between 2022 and 2023, suggesting that greater awareness among investors of the increased standards for broker-dealers and their registered representatives could lead to greater accountability for violations of the regulation. Further, data from FINRA also indicate that claims related to bond investments remain elevated, perhaps spurred by losses in the fixed income portions of customer portfolios amidst the rising rate environment, potentially serving as a warning to RIAs as well that their clients (and regulators) could take a closer look at advisor's recommendations related to bond allocations.
Also in industry news this week:
- The SEC has penalized 2 firms for false and misleading claims related to their use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), signaling the regulator's interest in advisers' "AI-washing" practices
- A research report suggests that fee-only RIAs with strong organic growth and enhanced service offerings for their clients are likely to be the most attractive acquisition targets in the coming year
From there, we have several articles on investments:
- While buffer ETFs allow investors to participate in (a portion of) the upside of the stock market while mitigating losses (up to a limit), investing effectively in these funds can be complicated and expensive
- Structured notes could be attractive for certain clients seeking investment income, but they come with a range of risks, from liquidity concerns to the potential for the issuing bank to default
- Investment strategies betting on continued muted volatility are gaining in popularity, though observers worry that some of these wagers could exacerbate a future market downturn
We also have a number of articles on branding:
- Why company culture is the foundation of a firm's brand and how leaders can evaluate whether their firm is on solid footing
- How advisory firms can maintain their unique brand while taking advantage of generative AI tools like ChatGPT
- How advisors can build their personal brand and link it to their professional identity to better attract clients
We wrap up with 3 final articles, all about burnout:
- The primary factors that lead to employee burnout and what firm leaders can do to create a more sustainable work environment
- Why saying 'no' to requests and opportunities more often can lead to less stress, and how individuals can overcome the psychological hurdles of doing so
- Tactics for overcoming "workaholism", from conducting regular self-check-ins to getting more sleep and exercise
Enjoy the 'light' reading!
Enjoy the current installment of “Weekend Reading For Financial Planners” – this week’s edition kicks off with the news that a recent survey suggests Americans are increasingly prioritizing work-life balance over higher salaries, with 2/3 of respondents indicating that they would rather work at a job that they loved rather than a job they disliked but paid more money. Nonetheless, Kitces Research suggests that when it comes to financial advisors, those with sufficient experience can often have both, with thriving advisors earning more and working fewer hours!
Also in industry news this week:
- With the new “T+1” rules for trade settlements will go into effect in late May, the SEC has issued a risk alert for broker-dealers and RIAs outlining the requirements they face and areas of focus for the regulator during upcoming examinations
- A recent survey suggests that while client satisfaction with their financial advisors increased during 2023, more than a third of wealthy Millennials indicated they are planning to change advisors in the coming year
From there, we have several articles on prospect and client communication:
- How advisors can adapt their communication styles to match the personality types of prospects and clients
- Why focusing on diagnosing a prospect’s financial problems, rather than working to build a personal relationship, could be a more effective strategy to win clients
- How to craft an effective advisor website biography to show an advisor’s humanity and help prospects overcome their fear of reaching out for help
We also have a number of articles on wealth management:
- How building a team of advisors – including financial, legal, and mental health professionals – can help the recipient of a financial windfall manage both the technical and psychological aspects of their newfound wealth
- How financial advisors can support clients in processing the emotional and financial ramifications of receiving an inheritance
- How advisors can help newly wealthy clients avoid common pitfalls, including insufficient insurance coverage and the temptation to pay household workers ‘under the table’
We wrap up with 3 final articles, all about innovation:
- How chance hallway conversations led to one of the biggest breakthroughs in artificial intelligence technology
- How the interstate highway system not only allowed for faster travel around the country, but also facilitated the growth of the economy as a whole and the rise of national chains
- Why malls are turning to high-end stores, gyms, and experiences to reinvent themselves at a time when many traditional shopping centers are struggling
Enjoy the ‘light’ reading!
One way financial advisors can add value for retiring clients is to estimate how much they can spend sustainably during their retirement years without depleting their investment portfolio. Advisors in this position have several options to help them determine a client's initial spending level, from 'static' approaches like the 4% Rule to more dynamic approaches that allow for higher initial withdrawal rates (but introduce the possibility of spending cuts during retirement).
One method introduced by Jonathan Guyton and William Klinger in 2006 is the "guardrails" framework. With this approach, an initial portfolio withdrawal rate is selected and, if market returns are strong (and the withdrawal rate falls 20% lower than the initial rate), dollar withdrawals are increased by 10% (providing more income than would a static withdrawal approach). On the other hand, in a time of weak market returns (that resulted in the withdrawal rate rising 20% higher than the initial rate), dollar withdrawals would be reduced by 10% (to avoid exhausting the portfolio). Compared to static withdrawal strategies, this approach not only provides an explicit plan for adjustments to keep retirees from spending too much or too little, but also gives retired clients an idea of what spending changes they would need to make if a market downturn were to occur.
Nonetheless, Guyton-Klinger guardrails have several serious shortcomings. For instance, this strategy assumes that retirees will target steady withdrawals throughout retirement, whereas portfolio income needs often vary over time (e.g., to cover retirement income needs before claiming Social Security benefits). Perhaps more importantly, this method can result in sharp reductions in retirement income that would be unfeasible for some retirees. Additionally, these income reductions tend to overcorrect for market losses, meaning that far more capital is often preserved than necessary at the cost of severe reductions in the retiree's standard of living.
As an alternative to the Guyton-Klinger guardrails approach, a risk-based guardrails strategy that relies on a financial plan's probability of success, as determined through Monte Carlo simulations, can be used to determine the initial dollar withdrawals and the need for (and magnitude of) upward or downward adjustments. An examination of how a retirement portfolio would have performed using this method reveals that much smaller income reductions would have been required, relative to the classic guardrails system, to prevent exhausting the client's portfolio. For instance, those retiring just before the Global Financial Crisis would have only seen a 3% income reduction from the initial withdrawal rate using risk-based guardrails, compared to 28% for the classic Guyton-Klinger guardrails approach, and those retiring before the Stagflation Era would have experienced a (still painful) 32% reduction, compared to 54% for the original approach!
Ultimately, the key point is that while Guyton-Klinger guardrails have offered a simple yet innovative framework to introduce dynamic spending adjustments during retirement, a future market downturn could leave clients (and potentially their advisors!) surprised at the depth of spending cuts called for by this approach. Instead, implementing a risk-based guardrails system can help mitigate the need for and size of downward spending adjustments while ensuring that a retiree's portfolio supports their lifetime spending needs!
For the advisor leading a virtual team, the day-to-day can offer a rewarding blend of flexibility, creativity, and productivity; at the same time, though, many of the benefits of remote work can also make it challenging to build a tight-knit team culture. For example, with flexibility comes fewer synchronous interactions, which in turn can result in less innovation, team bonding, and collaboration. While these criteria are not crucial to running a viable business, the reality is that they are still important factors in establishing a flourishing business, and face-to-face time in some form or another can be invaluable for building a strong, aligned team. This isn't to say that founders should throw in the virtual towel and try to convince their team members to move to their "headquarters" (assuming there is, in fact, a brick-and-mortar building for team members to even go to); instead, holding an in-person team retreat once or twice a year can be a powerful way to bring the team together… without having to commit to an in-person office in the long term.
In this article, Kitces Managing Editor Sydney Squires shares how the fully virtual Kitces team constructs its biannual team retreats – and how other leaders of virtual teams can also plan and execute a retreat of their own.
As a starting point, to get the most out of a team retreat, it's important to focus on 1 key theme driving the feeling that team members should leave with at the end of the retreat. This can be curated by assessing present team needs (which means the theme will likely change from retreat to retreat). For example, while a seasoned team who has just finished a busy tax season may need a retreat that leaves them feeling "recharged", a more recently formed team full of new hires may benefit more from feeling "aligned" with each other and with the company's vision. Starting with a theme is essential because it acts as a filter through which all other decisions can be made, from the type of venue that's selected to the different activities planned out.
Whatever theme is selected as the focal point of the retreat, 4 key takeaways can further drive home the main idea: (Re-)Setting The Vision (where company leaders share the past, present, and future vision of the company); Learn Yourself, Learn Your Team (where team members learn about each other and how to work together more cohesively); Connect With Who You Serve (where team members meet with those whom they work with closely, ranging from clients to contractors to Centers Of Influence); and, perhaps most importantly, Be Humans Together (where everyone can enjoy their face-to-face time and bond as a team).
While a great deal of work is involved in the logistical planning of organizing a retreat (e.g., determining dates, selecting a location, finding a venue, purchasing flights, and all of the other 'little' things required to get a virtual team into the same place at the same time), a good checklist – like the downloadable template we provide – can be instrumental in helping leaders ensure that all arrangements are optimally organized. Generally speaking, beginning the retreat planning process at least 4 months before the retreat date usually provides for enough time to work through all of the logistical details and offers enough advance notice to team members – though the time may vary depending on the retreat activities and the level of the retreat organizers' event planning experience.
Ultimately, the key point is that an in-person retreat can be a powerful tool to help a virtual team get many of the benefits of face-to-face collaboration without requiring the team to be physically together all the time. Additionally, with a cohesive theme guiding the agenda and a comprehensive checklist of logistical tasks, a team leader can delegate many of the organizational responsibilities that will contribute to a memorable and productive retreat!