<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>kitces.com | Nerd's Eye View - Retirement Planning</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/</link>
    <description>Commentary on financial planning news and developments</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.3.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:32:29 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Is There Really Much Value to Suspending 2009 RMDs?</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/32-Is-There-Really-Much-Value-to-Suspending-2009-RMDs.html</link>
            <category>Retirement Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/32-Is-There-Really-Much-Value-to-Suspending-2009-RMDs.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=32</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=32</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    
Yesterday, President Bush signed into law H.R. 7327, the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 (WRERA), which included certain provisions designed to suspend so-called Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) for the upcoming 2009 tax year. But will that really do much to help our clients? Probably not in most cases. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/32-Is-There-Really-Much-Value-to-Suspending-2009-RMDs.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Is There Really Much Value to Suspending 2009 RMDs?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:18:55 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/32-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Is the Safe Withdrawal Rate too safe? Or too aggressive!?</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/29-Is-the-Safe-Withdrawal-Rate-too-safe-Or-too-aggressive!.html</link>
            <category>Retirement Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/29-Is-the-Safe-Withdrawal-Rate-too-safe-Or-too-aggressive!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=29</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=29</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    
As readers of my newsletter know, in May I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/assets/pdfs/Kitces_Report_May_2008.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;The Kitces Report - May 2008&quot;&gt;published research&lt;/a&gt; that challenges the safe withdrawal rate as potentially being TOO safe in some environments, where market valuation is not at unfavorable extremes. However, in some feedback I&#039;ve received from readers, another important point is being made - in some cases, the safe withdrawal rate may also still be too aggressive!
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/29-Is-the-Safe-Withdrawal-Rate-too-safe-Or-too-aggressive!.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Is the Safe Withdrawal Rate too safe? Or too aggressive!?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:36:57 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/29-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Rigorous Analysis of Pension Options Done Right!</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/18-Rigorous-Analysis-of-Pension-Options-Done-Right!.html</link>
            <category>Retirement Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/18-Rigorous-Analysis-of-Pension-Options-Done-Right!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=18</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=18</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    
Many financial planners are faced with the client question: &amp;quot;Which pension option should I choose?&amp;quot; Comparing various lump sum and annual pension payout choices based on client life expectancies has often been mathematically intensive and quite difficult - at least, up until now.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/18-Rigorous-Analysis-of-Pension-Options-Done-Right!.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Rigorous Analysis of Pension Options Done Right!&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:19:13 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/18-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Should you withdraw and reapply for Social Security benefits?</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/10-Should-you-withdraw-and-reapply-for-Social-Security-benefits.html</link>
            <category>Retirement Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/10-Should-you-withdraw-and-reapply-for-Social-Security-benefits.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=10</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=10</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    
An interesting article in the syndicated column of Scott Burns suggests that it may be a wise strategy for those at or around age 70 to withdraw from Social Security and reapply to increase their benefit. Is this a Social Security loophole, a great deal, a trap, or just another good arrow in the financial planner&#039;s quiver?
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/10-Should-you-withdraw-and-reapply-for-Social-Security-benefits.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Should you withdraw and reapply for Social Security benefits?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:42 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/10-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Does extra retirement spending follow a consistent aging sequence?</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/9-Does-extra-retirement-spending-follow-a-consistent-aging-sequence.html</link>
            <category>Retirement Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/9-Does-extra-retirement-spending-follow-a-consistent-aging-sequence.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=9</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=9</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    
A new study from Sun Life Financial suggests that retirees may have a consistent sequence of extra spending goals throughout their retirement years. Of course, practicing financial planners have acknowledged for years that retirement spending isn&#039;t perfectly level from year to year, but Sun Life&#039;s new study suggests that there are some consistent patterns that can be gleaned.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/9-Does-extra-retirement-spending-follow-a-consistent-aging-sequence.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Does extra retirement spending follow a consistent aging sequence?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/index.php?/archives/9-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>