<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    
    <title>kitces.com | Nerd's Eye View - Estate Planning</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/</link>
    <description>Commentary on financial planning news and developments</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.5.5 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:48:46 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Planning Around Estate Tax Impermanence - Decisive Action Or Tentative Flexibility?</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/299-Planning-Around-Estate-Tax-Impermanence-Decisive-Action-Or-Tentative-Flexibility.html</link>
            <category>Estate Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/299-Planning-Around-Estate-Tax-Impermanence-Decisive-Action-Or-Tentative-Flexibility.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=299</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=299</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    In 2012, planners and clients once again face the proposition of the estate tax &#039;sunset&#039; that next year may revert the estate tax exemption and rate back to their 2001 levels. This impermanence in the current rules, with a scheduled lapse to a less favorable environment, creates an opportunity for clients to take decisive action while the current rules hold. Yet at the same time, if Congress ultimately does extend the current rules, decisive action may simply lead to irrevocable transfers that prove to be unnecessary, but cannot be unwound after the fact - a potential hardship for all but the wealthiest of ultra high net worth clients. And the reality is that there is little historical precedent for Congress to actually decrease the estate tax exemption or increase the estate tax rate - such a shift hasn&#039;t occurred since World War II! Accordingly, some planners have begun to lean in the opposite direction - viewing the current environment not as one for decisive action, but one for tentative flexibility and a wait-and-see approach.&amp;#160; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/299-Planning-Around-Estate-Tax-Impermanence-Decisive-Action-Or-Tentative-Flexibility.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Planning Around Estate Tax Impermanence - Decisive Action Or Tentative Flexibility?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:28:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/299-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>How Soon Will States Close Their Estate Tax Loopholes?</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/238-How-Soon-Will-States-Close-Their-Estate-Tax-Loopholes.html</link>
            <category>Estate Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/238-How-Soon-Will-States-Close-Their-Estate-Tax-Loopholes.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=238</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=238</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    The implementation of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, which both&amp;#160;increased the Federal estate tax exemption&amp;#160;and more importantly&amp;#160;eliminated the state estate tax credit, started the process of &amp;quot;decoupling&amp;quot; between the Federal estate tax and various states. As the years moved forward, many states retained a $1 million estate tax exemption amount, decoupling their exemption from the Federal amount that has ultimately risen to its current $5 million level. However, the reality is that a second decoupling just occurred in 2011 - the decoupling of state estate tax exemptions from the Federal gift tax exemption. As a result, a new state estate tax planning &amp;quot;loophole&amp;quot; has opened up, creating a planning opportunity for many clients... but only until the states close the loophole. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/238-How-Soon-Will-States-Close-Their-Estate-Tax-Loopholes.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;How Soon Will States Close Their Estate Tax Loopholes?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:32:50 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/238-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Legislative Uncertainty Creates New Problems For Estate Planning Gifting Strategies</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/150-Legislative-Uncertainty-Creates-New-Problems-For-Estate-Planning-Gifting-Strategies.html</link>
            <category>Estate Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/150-Legislative-Uncertainty-Creates-New-Problems-For-Estate-Planning-Gifting-Strategies.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=150</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=150</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Lifetime gifting is a widely accepted technique for managing potential exposure to future estate taxation. The purpose of the strategy is not just the obvious &amp;quot;if I give it away while I&#039;m alive, I can&#039;t be taxed on it when I die&amp;quot; - due to the fact that both gifting and estate taxation share the same single lifetime exemption amount that is protected from taxation. Nonetheless, gifting can still be highly effective, because once the asset is transferred, all future appreciation is in the hands of the donee, and not the donor; as a result, the value of the asset is &amp;quot;frozen&amp;quot; at its value on the date of gift in terms of its cumulative gift and estate tax impact. And with the gift tax exemption recently increased to $5 million - and only until the end of 2012, after which it is scheduled to lapse back to $1 million - many estate planners are counseling clients to make some big gifts while they can. There&#039;s just one problem: it&#039;s not clear whether a future reduction in the gift and estate tax exemption could indirectly cause a so-called &amp;quot;recapture tax&amp;quot; on prior gifts. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/150-Legislative-Uncertainty-Creates-New-Problems-For-Estate-Planning-Gifting-Strategies.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Legislative Uncertainty Creates New Problems For Estate Planning Gifting Strategies&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 13:06:38 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/150-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Charitable Contributions from IRAs are Back! And Overhyped! And Still an Inferior Gifting Strategy!</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/95-Charitable-Contributions-from-IRAs-are-Back!-And-Overhyped!-And-Still-an-Inferior-Gifting-Strategy!.html</link>
            <category>Estate Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/95-Charitable-Contributions-from-IRAs-are-Back!-And-Overhyped!-And-Still-an-Inferior-Gifting-Strategy!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=95</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=95</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    
&lt;p&gt;
Under the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (or the &amp;quot;Tax Relief Act&amp;quot; for short!) signed into law by President Obama on December 17th, taxpayers over age 70 1/2 may once again make up to $100,000 per year of so-called &amp;quot;qualified charitable distributions&amp;quot; out of their IRAs and directly to a charity, for the 2010 and 2011 tax years. Doing so allows the entire amount of the distribution to be excluded from income, effectively ensuring that those IRA dollars are never taxed, while also satisfying charitable goals. Unfortunately, the problem is that this is actually a remarkably INefficient way to make significant charitable gifts, compared to other alternatives available under the tax law!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/95-Charitable-Contributions-from-IRAs-are-Back!-And-Overhyped!-And-Still-an-Inferior-Gifting-Strategy!.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Charitable Contributions from IRAs are Back! And Overhyped! And Still an Inferior Gifting Strategy!&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:03:08 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/95-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Estate Planning in 2011: Is It Time To Bypass The Bypass Trust?</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/92-Estate-Planning-in-2011-Is-It-Time-To-Bypass-The-Bypass-Trust.html</link>
            <category>Estate Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/92-Estate-Planning-in-2011-Is-It-Time-To-Bypass-The-Bypass-Trust.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=92</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=92</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;Planning around estate taxes by using a Bypass Trust is a &amp;quot;basic&amp;quot; strategy that has been around for decades. In fact, for many clients, it was a major impetus to get their estate planning done in the first place - if your estate was above a certain threshold and you didn&#039;t get estate documents that would put a proper Bypass Trust in place, it could cost your beneficiaries hundreds of thousands of dollars. Yet with the new provisions of the tax legislation signed into law last week by President Obama, Bypass Trusts will no longer be necessary for many clients to maximize the use of a couple&#039;s estate tax exemptions - which means it may be time to bypass the Bypass Trust planning strategy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/92-Estate-Planning-in-2011-Is-It-Time-To-Bypass-The-Bypass-Trust.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Estate Planning in 2011: Is It Time To Bypass The Bypass Trust?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:24:25 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/92-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Negative buzz about Vanguard's IRA beneficiary rules</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/25-Negative-buzz-about-Vanguards-IRA-beneficiary-rules.html</link>
            <category>Estate Planning</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/25-Negative-buzz-about-Vanguards-IRA-beneficiary-rules.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=25</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=25</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    
&lt;p&gt;
Do your clients have retirement accounts held directly with Vanguard? More than one? Do you know who the beneficiaries are for each account? Are you SURE you have that right? Sorry, think again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/25-Negative-buzz-about-Vanguards-IRA-beneficiary-rules.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Negative buzz about Vanguard&#039;s IRA beneficiary rules&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:42:31 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/25-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
